|
![]() |
||||
7. BAIN
In truth Bain’s principle character
weakness was an inability to collaborate with his peers; a plain mechanic, he
never had a scientific or technical mentor, nor an education that would have
allowed him to appreciate the work of others. Moreover, he was unable to maintain
any of the professional partnerships that he attempted with which to channel
his ideas into consistent reality. He seems to have gone out of his way to give
offence to potential allies. The level of Bain’s contrived ill-will
may be judged by his continued antipathy to Wheatstone. Alone among the professor’s
many “mechanical” collaborators, who included William Reid, Louis Lachenal,
Nathaniel Holmes, Augustus Stroh and Robert Sabine, Bain passed himself into
posterity as a victim of his evil machinations. All the others co-operated and
flourished alongside of Wheatstone for several decades. Bain,
as will be seen, created many ingenious devices in a great many fields; the
electric clock and the chemical telegraph had lasting impacts on technology.
Unfortunately his temperament was such that these achievements gave him little
but sorrow and disappointment. Bain Clock 1848 The Electric Clock Bain Pendulum 1848
The partnership managed to produce sixty
of Barwise & Bain’s electric clocks, “working at the expense of 2d a week”,
for exhibition at the Royal Polytechnic Institution, 309 Regent Street, London,
during July, August and September 1841. These were made at Alexander Bain’s
Electric Clock & Telegraph Manufactory, 11 Hanover Street, Edinburgh. As well as devising several forms of
electric pendulum or ‘master’ clock, which included a simplified mechanism for
converting the swing action into rotary motion, Bain placed many much smaller
‘companion’, now known as ‘slave’, dials in the same circuit. Adjusting the
master simultaneously corrected the companions which worked in precise
synchronicity. More than that in 1848 he had a master clock in Edinburgh regulate
a small companion forty-six miles away in Glasgow with a circuit along the
railway between the two cities. It proved to be the first of many missed
opportunities in Bain’s life; the partnership failed and Barwise went on to
found the British Watch Company in 1843, the first attempt to factory-make
timepieces in volume. Bain was not alone in investigating the use of electricity to propel clock movements. As well as Steinheil in Munich, Charles Wheatstone had already determined the principles of what he called the Magnetic Clock. In 1840 he installed an electric master movement and six connected ‘slave’ dials at King’s College, London. The master device and the small, neatly-cased Magnetic Clocks were made by the eminent clockmaker E J Dent of 82 Strand, almost adjacent to the College. Claiming that his, or more accurately Steinheil’s, concept had been copied; Bain never forgave Wheatstone for ‘stealing his thunder.’ One of Wheatstone’s clocks of 1840 still exists. Bain type-printing telegraph 1841 The Mechanical Telegraph The mechanical telegraphs used galvanic electricity to manage power produced by clockwork. In Bain’s first telegraph pulses of electricity created by rotating a dial over contact points were used to release and stop a type-wheel turned by weight-driven clockwork; a second clockwork mechanism rotated a drum covered with a sheet of paper and moved it slowly upwards so that the type-wheel printed its signals in a spiral. The critical issue was to have the sending and receiving elements working synchronously. Bain attempted to achieve this using centrifugal governors to closely regulate the speed of the clockwork.
Bain electro-magnetic railway controller 1841 In the same patent of 1841 Bain and
Wright introduced the electro-magnetic railway controller, an apparatus intended
to signal between two moving trains. A pilot engine ran a mile-and-a-half or so
in front of another locomotive hauling a train. A current between the pilot
engine and the train engine was carried by insulated conductors running along
the centre of the railway, with a “leg” beneath the locomotives making the electrical
connection. Should the pilot engine stop or the current between the pilot and
the main engine be disrupted a visible signal was given on the footplate. If
that was ignored a whistle, gong or other alarm was sounded, if this too were
ignored the apparatus turned off the steam and applied the brakes of the locomotive. A centrifugal governor linked to the wheels of the pilot engine by a belt was employed to break the current should engine stop, causing a needle on a telegraph dial on the following locomotive to indicate “dangerous” and also to set off clockwork that rang an alarm bell and then released a weighted lever to shut off the steam. The clockwork was wound automatically by the motion of the locomotive. It was only made as a table-top model. Bain & Gauci Patent Ink-stands 1841 A range of complex mechanical desktop vessels for keeping writing inks On June 21 of the same year, 1841, Bain
took out another patent, this time in association with the artist Paul Joseph
Gauci, for “ink-stands and ink-holders”. These were complex desk-top reservoirs
for writing ink into which steel-nibbed pens, which replaced quills, were
dipped. There were several sorts, including ones with miniature pumps and
others with rotating bodies to prevent the elements of the ink separating. He
returned several times over the years to improving these devices.
The Chemical Telegraph The famous chemical engineer, Isham Baggs, had also patented a “method of printing colours by electricity” on January 23, 1841. This used electro-chemical decomposition to form images on both paper and cloth. Bain Chemical Telegraph 1843 The perfected Bain chemical telegraph of
1843 consisted of a finger pedal or on-off key to make and break the circuit
and a roll of electrically-sensitive paper fed by clockwork between a brass
roller and a single metal feeler as part of the circuit. The current caused a
mark to be made on the paper in a series of dots and dashes interpreted into
the roman alphabet in so-called “Bain Code”. In its essence it was remarkably
simple, and also silent in operation, but Bain would not leave it alone in its
simplicity. A much more elaborate pattern of chemical
telegraph also introduced in 1843 had identical mechanically-driven sending and
receiving instruments. This had a rotary sender using punched tape, on the
Jacquard principle, running under two metallic feelers to make and break the
electrical circuit; to receive messages the punched paper tape roll was replaced
by strips of chemically-sensitive paper, which had to be kept damp, running
under the metal points to cause the marks. The need for precise synchronisation
defeated this first effort at automatic telegraphy, despite the use of ever
larger centrifugal governors on each instrument. In the version utilised on the circuits
of the Electric Telegraph Company “a strip of paper is drawn off a small
gutta-percha bobbin placed inside a short brass cylinder, and over a drum whose
surface is silvered; the latter is rotated by clockwork having a fan brake or
governor. The clockwork is started or stopped by a small lever working between
two stops and when in the running position makes contact with the earth terminal.
A small wooden roller can be pushed into contact with the silvered drum to keep
the paper stretched and at the same time bring the style down to the paper. The
style is made from iron or steel and is connected with the line wire terminal,
while the drum against which it is kept pressed is in connection with the earth
terminal. The paper tape was soaked in a mixture of one volume of a saturated
solution of potassium ferro-cyanide, one volume of a saturated solution of ammonium
nitrate, and two volumes of water; the latter salt being deliquescent served to
keep the paper damp. When a current passes, the iron decomposes the electrolyte,
uniting with the acid radical to form Prussian blue; other solutions, such as
potassium iodide, can be used, the iodine liberated from which colours a starch
solution. The Steinheil code, dots in two parallel lines, was originally used.
A gutta-percha trough was used for damping the rolls of paper tape.” Bain also devised, in July 1843, a ‘Voltaic
Governor’ to manage the current for electrotyping, the creation of precise
copies of metallic illustrations and type. It used clockwork moderated by an
electro-magnet to lower the plates into an electric cell to maintain a steady
current and even thickness of metal deposit.
Bain improved I & V Telegraph 1845 The I & V Telegraph It was described at the time as: “Mr.
Bain’s single-index telegraph, which was the instrument proposed by him for
practical use, consisted of two hollow cylindrical coils of wire, placed horizontally
a short distance apart, with their axes in the same line. Between them a small
bar magnet was fixed across a delicate spring, which in front passed through
the dial-plate of the instrument, and was turned up to form an index. The two
coils were connected, so that an electric current entering from the line wire
would pass through both. When this was the case, the bar magnet would be
attracted towards one coil, while at the same time it would be repelled by the
other. These actions tended to carry the magnet to the same side, as far as the
spring to which it was attached and a fixed stop would allow of its moving. The
reversal of the current inverted the effects of the coils, and the magnet would
then pass to the other side. The combinations of these two movements represented
the various letters and signals, being denoted to the observer by the index on
the dial of the instrument. The movement of the index to the left denoting the
letter I, and to the right the letter V, this instrument obtained the name
of ‘I and V Telegraph.’” He simplified the I & V telegraph in
his patent of 1845 by substituting a single drop-handled current-reversing commutator
for the double-pedals or keys, and legally also protected the I & V code. This
was the apparatus used on the Edinburgh & Glasgow Railway.
Bain completed his first line of electric
telegraph alongside of the Edinburgh & Glasgow Railway in December 1845. It
ran for forty-six miles as a single iron wire carried atop nine foot high larch
poles on “porcelain knobs”, the poles set 200 feet apart. There were seven
telegraph stations, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Cowlairs, Kirkintilloch, Castlecary,
Falkirk and Ratho, opened to the public from June 6, 1846. The circuit cost £50
a mile to construct, or in total £2,400 – including the galvanic batteries and
eight Bain instruments. The apparatus was the I & V single-needle telegraph
that worked two codes, one for commercial messages, the other for specialist
railway traffic. On April 29, 1846 Bain used this single wire circuit to demonstrate
the utility of his electric clocks, a master timepiece in Edinburgh was connected
to a small companion dial over the forty-six miles and synchronised their timekeeping
electrically. In December of that year he used the same two clocks for a public
demonstration in Glasgow. The I & V telegraph was also installed to manage traffic on the single-track 1,540 yard Shildon Tunnel of the Stockton & Darlington Railway. The railway agreed to pay Bain £50 to use his patent rights and for erecting wires, batteries, and so on, on August 4, 1846. They were installed in “cabins” at either end of the long tunnel. The Shildon telegraph was in use until 1868, and at least one of the two instruments still exists.
![]() Bain Code used with the I & V Telegraph in Austria 1850 The Bain I & V Code used on the
Edinburgh & Glasgow Railway was as follows: I – A; II - B; III - C; IIII -
D; VI - E; VII - F; VIII - G; IVI - H; VVI - I; IVVI - L; VVII - M; VVVI - N; VIVI
- O; IV - P; IIV - Q; IIIV - R; VIV - S; VV - T; IVIV - U; IVV - V; VVV - W; IVVV
- X; VIVV - Y; VVIV - Z; V - (End); VIIV - (Stop); I - 1; II - 2; III - 3; IV -
4; V - 5; VI - 6; VII - 7; VIII - 8; VIV - 9; VV - 10. On the Stockton & Darlington Railway
in England there was a variant in use: I - A; II - B; III - C; IIII - D; V - E;
VV - F; VVV - G; VVVV - H; IV - I; IIV - J; IIIV - K; VI - L; VII - M; VIII -
N; IVI - O; IVII - P; IIVI - Q; VVI - R; IVV - S; VIV - T; VVVI - U; IVVV - V; VIVV
- W; VVII - Y; VIVI - Z; IVIV - (Stop). This may have been adapted from the
original I & V code over the years. Front View An adaptation of an earlier
patent, with two rotating drums worked by clockwork,
Side View The Copying Telegraph Bain, as usual, gave in to one of his
rages and attacked Bakewell in the press over several years, going to the trouble
of making his own, extremely complex, version of a copying telegraph in 1850. This
had two drums and two electrical feelers, one for sending one for receiving,
all driven by clockwork and held synchronous by a massive centrifugal governor.
It seems that he eventually came to some sort of business arrangement with
Bakewell; he acquired a one third share of a patent the latter obtained for a
soda-water making machine for £200, and they had adjacent stands showing copying
telegraphs at the Great Exhibition of 1851. It has to be added, too, that the
Electric Telegraph Company, by then the owners of the Bain telegraph and clock patents,
notoriously litigious in protecting its rights, did not challenge the originality
of the copying principle introduced by Bakewell in 1848, and, in fact,
co-operated with him. On September 22, 1848 the Company allowed Bakewell to use
a single wire circuit between its office at Seymour Street in London and the
“Telegraph Cottage” in Slough to try his new “small instruments”. William Carpmael, the leading patent
lawyer of the time, who was also a qualified engineer, stated to Bakewell in
the summer of 1848 that “The copying of writing has never been attempted before
- the field is quite open to you.” It was Bakewell who wrote, not unreasonably, that “Mr Bain has in several instances introduced complex mechanisms for effecting the simplest purposes”; an observation with which anyone reading these pages must undoubtedly agree. The Navigator The Navigator aside; the electric clock
and telegraph business was good: during April 1845 Bain had to advertise in
Glasgow for instrument makers for his Edinburgh workshops, and again at the end
of December for cabinet makers to case his telegraphs and clocks. On September 25, 1845, on December 12,
1846 and again on February 19, 1847 Bain patented additional improvements to
both his clocks and telegraphs. Perspective, Highton on Bain “We will now pass on to the patents of
Mr Alexander Bain. “Mr Bain, in 1845, opposed the Bill of
the old Electric Telegraph Company, when before Parliament. The result was a
compromise between the parties, and the purchase by that Company of the patents
of Mr Bain. “The first [telegraphic] patent of
Mr Bain was sealed December 21, 1841 [Patent 9,204]. This patent relates
to a telegraph applicable to locomotive engines. With regard to that part which
has more immediate reference to the electric telegraph, Mr Bain proposed to
have the coil moveable, and the magnet stationary; Cooke and Wheatstone's plan
being the reverse of this, viz., the coil being stationary, and the magnet moveable. “Mr Bain proposed to apply this mode of
obtaining motion both to ordinary telegraphs as well as to a new form of
printing telegraph. This printing telegraph was an extremely ingenious one at
the time. A modification of it was afterwards at work for some time over a few
miles on the South Western Railway. “In this patent also was
included a mode of insulating wires by means of bitumen. “A second patent was taken out
by Mr Bain in 1843 [Patent 9,745]. “This patent contains
improvements on the foregoing plans, besides several other new arrangements,
and also a plan of lowering the plates of a battery by means of clock-work
mechanism and an electro-magnet, so as to keep the power employed always of the
same strength. “The patent has also inventions
with respect to electric clocks, and describes as well a mode of producing copies
of type by means of electro-chemical decomposition. “The telegraph known as Bain’s I and V
telegraph (so called from the particular figures which were employed in forming
words and sentences) is fully described in the Specification. “Mr Bain also, in the same
Specification, describes his mode of burying in the earth a mass of copper at
one terminal station, and a mass of zinc at the other, and joining, when
desired, these metals by the line-wire. A current of electricity could of
course flow through the wire, and this electricity was to produce the necessary
signals. “To those versed in the science of
electricity, it will be evident that this arrangement was but the using of one
large cell, in which the mass of copper and of zinc formed the plates, the earth
the jar or cell, and the moisture in the earth the exciting liquid. “The practical objections to this
arrangement consist in the want of intensity in the electricity generated, and
in the motion of a magnetic body being obtained only in one direction. “A third patent was taken out
by Mr Bain in 1845. This patent was sealed on the 25th September
[Patent 10,835]. “The first part refers to suspending
wires in a kind of fence railing, and also a peculiar mode of suspending wires
on posts. “Another part refers to the handle
apparatus of a telegraph for transmitting currents of electricity. There is
nothing new in the principle herein employed, but the mechanism differed from
that in use at the time. “There are also modes of sounding
alarums, and also improvements on codes to be used with the I and V telegraph. “Improvements are also set forth in
step-by-step movement telegraphs, and in printing or dotting telegraphs.
Several improvements in electric clocks are also described. “A fourth patent was taken out
by Mr Bain in 1846. This patent was sealed on the 12th of December
[Patent 11,480]. The first part refers to the mode described of a one-wire
chemically marking telegraph. A circular wheel, with moveable projecting pins,
was employed. When the pins were pulled out as the wheel revolved, they came
into contact with other spring pins, and thus caused currents of electricity to
be transmitted from a battery, producing thereby corresponding chemical marks
on chemically prepared paper at the distant station. “Another plan consisted in cutting out
slits of different lengths in a long strip of paper at the transmitting station,
and allowing this perforated strip to pass uniformly over a metal cylinder with
a pin or spring pressing on the top of the paper. Whenever, therefore, a hole
in the paper passed under the pin, the pin came into metallic contact with the
cylinder underneath, and allowed a current of electricity to pass through the
line wire. All the holes in the paper, and their length, were therefore proportionably
represented at the distant station by chemical marks of corresponding lengths
on the prepared paper at that station. This form of telegraph is the quickest
at present invented. It does not, however, seem suited to ordinary
communications, but only to the transmission
of very long documents on extraordinary occasions. “If one person only is employed to punch
holes in the paper, it is evident that, instead of making a hole in the paper,
a current of electricity might as readily be sent, and a chemical mark made at
the distant station, and thus the message might actually be sent in the same
time as that required for cutting the paper. But this remark applies only to
the case where there is but one attendant for a wire. If
a number of men be employed at each station, then, by
dividing the message into parts, and each man punching out his part, the whole
paper can be perforated in less time than one man could send the
message. On uniting this perforated paper, and applying it to a machine, and on
turning the cylinder round, corresponding chemical marks may be made at a
distant station with very great rapidity. The commercial question is therefore,
where ordinary communications are alone required, one of large working expenses
versus a rather larger outlay of capital in the first instance. The plan
proposed, however, is most ingenious, and the instrument will form a good
adjunct to the other instruments at very important stations. “This same patent also includes
a form of telegraph post. This is composed of four thin slabs of timber fastened
together in the manner of a box, the interior being hollow. The author is
not aware that this plan of post has ever been adopted. “Owing to the fact that no publication of
the Specifications of these patents has yet been made, the author is unable to
give drawings of the same, or to refer more fully thereto. These telegraphs
show very great ingenuity in their various parts, as also in the mechanical details
employed.” Highton in his chronology misses out some of Bain’s other patents, including those for the electric clock and its improvements, but makes the important point in culmination that Bain avoided publishing the details of many of his ideas until they were proven to work, which they often did not. The sheer volume of Bain’s ideas at this time is remarkable, particularly as he chose to work entirely alone in developing them. ![]() Bain Electric Motor
A Bain design model, an iron "bit" on a central rod is alternately attracted by two pairs of electro-magnets to work a crank shaft Bitter Revilings Finlaison was sufficiently impressed with
Bain’s work to loan him £3,000 in 1846 to complete his principal telegraphic
work, the circuit between Edinburgh and Glasgow. This was used to demonstrate
both his I & V telegraph and the transmission of time using his electric
clock. He also paid to have a large electric clock installed in the new Church
of St John the Baptist, in Church Lane, Loughton in 1848. It proved unreliable
and was replaced in 1850, by which time John Finlaison had moved to Lower Mead,
Richmond-upon-Thames, Surrey and Bain was in America. It was John Finlaison’s substantial, even
lavish pamphlet of 1843 giving a partial view of Bain’s dispute with Charles
Wheatstone over the electric clock that has affected all subsequent views of
the inventor’s grievances. Although Wheatstone chose to ignore “the bitter
revilings” contained in the paper, others at the time were more forthcoming
with their opinions. C V Walker, the electrician of the South Eastern Railway,
wrote in ‘The Electrical Magazine’ of October 1843, “We are quite sure that the
great want of courtesy displayed in every page of Mr Finlaison’s work will induce
many to close the volume without doing justice to the young man, in whose behalf
it is penned. The author has been ‘zealous overmuch;’ in his ardour to maintain
the rights of his fellow-townsman, he has outstripped his better self, and has
so interwoven the plain statement of the case with sarcasm and ‘railing
accusation.’” The relationship between Finlaison and Bain does not seem to have survived beyond 1850.
Bain
Electric Printing Telegraph 1844 Biter Bit This telegraph was, according to
Alexander Bain, demonstrated “before the Lords of the Admiralty and several
hundred visitors”. This was his first great opportunity to enter the new market
for electrical communication; the first long line of electric telegraph to be
built in Britain. It would show to the government and, more importantly, to the
railway companies which had access to all the cities and town of Britain, that
his apparatus had the potential to work effectively over long distance. Bain
got it all wrong. Bain’s electric printing telegraph was a
small but complex machine mounted on a tall table. The two instruments were
precisely similar, connected by a single copper wire in a thin layer of
asphalt. At Nine Elms, imbedded in the earth, and attached to the apparatus by
a copper wire was a plate of copper one foot square; and, at Wimbledon, a plate
of zinc, also one foot square, these, which with the action of the earth’s
moisture, formed a natural or telluric battery. They were mechanical telegraphs, each containing
two clockwork mechanisms, one to propel the message function, the other the
printing function, worked by two large weights; “electricity being employed
merely as the agent of setting the apparatus in motion and stopping it at the
points required”.
The
Control Dial of
Bain’s Electric Printing
Telegraph Communication was undertaken by freeing the hand on the dial and allowing it to rotate, simultaneously with a separate print-wheel, by the first clockwork, the speed and action controlled by centrifugal governors. When the hand reached the appropriate figure or number on the dial the operator pressed down on a tubular mercury-filled switch to complete the electric circuit and stop the rotation. The stopping and collapse of the centrifugal governor triggered the second clockwork, propelling the print mechanism, to press the still print wheel against a vertical cylinder carrying the paper, through a double ink ribbon. Once the mark was made the print mechanism rotated the cylinder one character and moved fractionally upwards on a spiral shaft. ![]() Left:
The rotating print head and rising printing cylinder of Bain’s electric
printing telegraph 1844 The message was read at both instruments
on the dial and was printed spirally around the rising cylinder. Twelve figures
or numbers were used for signalling, not the roman alphabet. For special
messages a slip of paper could be inserted between the pair of ink ribbons to
make an additional, removable copy. A spiral metallic rod alarm or sounder was
also included to warn of a message, “much the same as is used in clocks on the
Continent..., producing a sound as distinct as a bell, but of a much more
mellow and musical note.” “Such is its velocity, that when this
telegraph shall be laid down the entire line, the time occupied in the transit
of a message, from Nine Elms to Portsmouth, and receiving the answer in town,
will not exceed two minutes and a quarter.” The extreme complexity of the
clockwork-driven electric printing telegraph, the frailty of its line-side
circuit and the unreliability of the telluric or earth battery, militated
against its adoption. Cooke & Wheatstone won, and completed the very first
long line of electric telegraph in Britain between London and Portsmouth on
February 1, 1845 using their two-needle system. Bain
Chemical Telegraph 1848 Bought Out Latterly the crude small hole-punch worked by a rubber hammer was replaced by two machines. In the first, “two handles are fixed to levers with which circular punches are connected; the levers, by a ratchet and pawl, feed the tape from a reel through the instrument. The lever on the right actuates the feed motion without punching, so giving spaces between letters and words; the combinations of circular perforations give the code”. A later punch, designed by Latimer Clark of the Electric Telegraph Company and made by Meinrad Theiler in 1855, had three levers: one for moving the tape, one for punching dots and one for punching dashes for the “European Alphabet”. Bain received 150 shares in the Electric
Telegraph Company, taken as fully paid-up, with a nominal value of £3,750 on
July 1, 1847. He had disposed of them all by December 1848. Bain had previously licensed, for a
handsome fee, the entire French rights for the chemical telegraph to William
Boggett, a button manufacturer, of 50 St Martin’s Lane, Charing Cross, an
electrical dilettante who corresponded with Michael Faraday. It was tried over
ever longer distances and at remarkable speeds but was not adopted in France. Although it was extremely sensitive, requiring relatively little galvanic energy in its circuits, the chief disadvantage of the chemical telegraph was the need for the marking paper to be kept damp in use, which made it frail and malodorous. It was also vulnerable to disruption by ‘atmospheric electricity’. When used in America Bain’s chemical-paper rolls were replaced by more durable flat disks of treated paper on a metal plate, twenty-inches in diameter, rotated by a clockwork-driven roller, and the receiving wire caused to move spirally across the disk on a metal arm from a central spindle in the manner of a gramophone needle.
Bain
Alphabet or Telegraph Code 1848 The Bain telegraph was used in the Electric’s
domestic circuits until replaced by the American telegraph in 1862 and later by
Charles Wheatstone’s automatic telegraph. Both of these substituted more stable
electro-magnetic ‘writers’ using ink on a plain-paper tape for chemical
elements. The Electric Telegraph Company paid Bain
£7,500 for his initial clock and telegraph patents in Britain and allowed him
£2,500 contingent on his services to the firm in 1846. He became a director of
the Company for a short while. When he patented the fast telegraph in 1848 the
Company purchased the rights for Britain for £13,250, half in cash, half in
shares. Bain was also scrupulous in simultaneously patenting his clock and telegraphs
throughout Europe and America. The Electric Telegraph Company formed a
separate Clock Department under Bain’s management and initially displayed his
electric clocks at their show- and news-rooms at 142 Strand, opposite their
first chief office at 345 Strand. They retained Bain’s clock manufactory at 11
Hanover Street, Edinburgh until 1848 when it was closed and the work contracted
out to William Reid in London. In April 1847 the manufactory was developing an electric
chronometer, to keep perfect time at sea, using salt water to produce a continuous
source of galvanic energy. The electric clocks were extremely
expensive, selling for £16 16s for ‘master’ time- pieces and £10 10s for each
‘companion’ dial. Running costs were high, too: 1d a week using a single small
Smee zinc-silver cell, which lasted just fourteen days. Despite this several
hundred were made between 1845 and 1848, and serially numbered; they were
marked on the dial “Electric Telegraph Compy. No. XXX. A. Bain Invenit.” During 1847 there was a major effort to
publicise the electric clocks. In February, the parish church in Leeds in
Yorkshire installed one in its tower, followed by another at Great Wenham in
Suffolk in April. The latter had two dials each four feet in diameter and was
still going well, according to the Ipswich newspapers, in the autumn. In August
the Electric Telegraph Company installed one in the window of the offices of
the ‘Manchester Times’ and was rewarded amply with column inches of publicity.
The Exchange in Manchester also possessed an electric clock in 1847, which the
other newspapers diligently covered in their columns. The Company promoted them
as “the Electric Clock with Perpetual Motion”, as it relied on a telluric or
earth battery buried deep in the ground; adding “there is not a single spring
in this clock”. The Electric company had severe financial
problems in the late 1840s and was unable to proceed with the marketing of
electric clocks. It is likely that Bain was disillusioned with this; but he had
also failed to use his period with the Electric to build any peer relationships.
The company’s engineers, rather than Bain, had to adapt the fast telegraph into
an effective device. He proved resentful of the company’s lack
of resource in promoting the clocks and was to oppose their interests
subsequently in public and in law. Whatever his other business commitments were in that hectic period Bain found time to devise a “musical instrument”. It was actually a musical box with a pneumatic source modulated by holes in a tape, obviously based on the tape transmitter of his chemical telegraph, which he patented on October 7, 1847.
The Austrian Bain I & V Telegraph System 1846 An adaptation of the principles used on the Edinburgh & Glasgow Railway to make both an acoustic and an indicating instrument. It used double pedals or keys to move the needle / hammer left or right
Austria Baumgartner was to visit, among other
sites of interest, the telegraph installed on the Edinburgh & Glasgow
Railway, which worked Alexander Bain’s novel I & V single-needle telegraph
with a single overhead wire. After comparing his report on the I & V
telegraph with other British, French and German systems the Austrian technical
commission agreed to adopt Bain’s principles for their national network. Alexander Bain is uncharacteristically
reticent in regard to Austrian adoption of the I & V telegraph in 1846. It
appears that the commission bought the patent right for the instrument’s
principles and implemented its use and development without further
consultation. There is no evidence that Bain visited Austria. However subsequent history shows that the
I & V telegraph had considerable utility and its extension was only brought
up short by the need to standardise on a single system in the German-speaking
world rather than by any technical deficiency. A short experimental Bain line was laid
by the rails of the Nordbahn on the section between Vienna and Floridsdorf in 1845 to
demonstrate the new system. It was to be extended to the rest of its network in
the following years, which connected Vienna with Brünn for Prague, and Oderberg for Prussian Silesia and Russia. On January 16, 1847 a decree of the Privy
Council created the kaiser königlichen Staats-Telegraph or Imperial Royal State Telegraph as a monopoly
of the government. It adopted Bain’s apparatus as the basis of its system. Bain I & V Alphabet
A =
12 1
= 11 Formed from combinations of numbers 1 and 5 (I and V) on the receiver. The initial Austrian Bain instruments
were made by Johann Michael Ekling in Vienna, and later by the k.k.
Telegraphenwerkstätte Wein, the Imperial Royal Telegraph Workshops Vienna. Each
apparatus comprised two communicators or receivers, one double key, one
Steinheil galvanic alarm, one electro-magnet, one resistance, and one box with
a worktop, holding a battery in the base. The whole set cost 97.20 florins, a
little less than £10. They were worked with eight Smee silver-zinc cells on
short lines, and up to 24 Smee cells on the longest lines, these also
originating in Britain. The line wire was of copper, one Viennese
“line” (2.4 mm) in gauge, supported on wooden poles between 9 and 14 Viennese
feet high, and 80 Viennese feet apart (1 Viennese foot = 31.61 cm), topped with
small zinc-metal “roofs” to deflect rain. The pottery insulators were of a
novel semi-circular pattern with a hole for the line wire, made by the k.k.
Porzellanfabrik in Vienna, stapled to each side of the pole, much like W F
Cooke’s first ceramic insulator. There were four Bain circuits built in
Austria for the k.k. Staatstelegraph: the Northern line from Vienna to Prague,
by way of Prerau and Olmütz, (164 km), and the alternate Vienna to Prague route
via Lundenburg and Brünn (150 km); the Eastern line from Vienna to Pressburg
(11 km); and the exceptionally long and difficult Southern line from Vienna to
the port of Trieste on the Adriatic coast (954 km). A planned Western line running
from Vienna to Linz and Salzburg in 1849 was not built as a Bain circuit. By 1849 the k.k. Staatstelegraph worked
1,667 km of Bain line, with 23 stations employing 94 “manipulators” and 55
line-men. Although the Austrian Bain system was abandoned
by the k.k. Staatstelegraph with the adherence of Vienna to the German-Austrian
Telegraph Union in 1850 which standardised on the American telegraph, the Kaiser
Ferdinand Nordbahn retained it in service on its railway network to Silesia and
Russia until 1886. The writer thanks Prof Franz Pichler of
the Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria, for introducing him to his works
‘Elektrisches Schreiben in die Ferne’, and ‘Telegraphen-Apparate’ on which this
section is based.
Bain
Chemical Printer 1855
America A mammoth battle then commenced in the
courts, where the Morse Syndicate used its financial influence to affect the
law officers and the patent office in its favour. It took many years to secure
Bain’s patent right for the chemical telegraph. Bain left England after commuting his payment
from the Electric Telegraph Company, receiving instead the residual rights to
the electric clock patent and the chemical telegraph rights for British North
America. The Company also lent him £1,000 at 4% interest. On his arrival he
licensed his American patent for the chemical telegraph to Henry Rogers &
Company of Baltimore, Maryland, to be used in a 250 mile line between New York
and Washington, by way of Philadelphia and Baltimore, challenging the Morse
Syndicate over that route. Shortly after Bain entered into another licensing
agreement with Henry O’Rielly, who had been previously a Morse licensee, who
undertook to make 800 miles of telegraph line a year working his patents. Bain
was to receive $30 per mile and 25% of the paid-up stock of these new main
lines, and 10% of the stock for all branch circuits. O’Rielly constructed six
Bain lines; 1] from Boston to New York; 2] from Buffalo to New York; 3] from
Boston to Portland, Maine; 4] from Boston to Burlington in Vermont; 5] from
Louisville, Kentucky, to New Orleans, Louisiana; and 6] minor lines in Massachusetts
and Vermont. Bain
Chemical Telegraph 1848 Bain initially took rooms at 128
Broadway, New York, the office of his lawyer W H Allen, where he displayed his
electric clocks and the chemical telegraph. The version of the latter he presented
in October 1848 was quite different from his British version: it had a rotary
sender using punched paper tape attached to a box which held two metallic
receiving drums covered with chemically sensitive paper propelled by clockwork.
A fine metallic feeler rested on each drum to create the circuit, one of which
recorded the sent message, the other received messages. The messages were
“written” spirally around the drum as the sender was cranked by hand. It was
demonstrated as sending 1,200 letters a minute. This elaborate device was replaced in actual service by a simple on-off finger pedal or key for transmitting and a flat rotating circular plate with the electric feeler on a swivelling arm to “write” or receive the novel Bain Code of dots and dashes helically on a damp paper disk. The receiver was propelled by clockwork. The alarm used was electro-magnetic with a glass sounder. By 1850 there were 2,012 miles of electric telegraph in the United States worked under Bain's patents.During October 1848 ‘Scientific American’
lauded Alexander Bain as “the first electrical engineer in the World”. The
reaction of S F B Morse to this accolade is not recorded.
Bain
Chemical Telegraph 1850
Europe During May 1850 Bain presented a new
automatic telegraph to la Société d’encouragement pour l’industrie nationale in
Paris, France. This comprised, as with his fast telegraph, a small punch making
long and short holes in a long paper tape which was rolled on to a wooden
cylinder. The second component was a sending apparatus that fed, by means of a
hand crank, the punched paper between four metallic feelers and a metallic cylinder
creating a circuit. The final part, a clockwork- driven receiver, had a rotating
metallic disk covered with a circular sheet of chemically-damped paper. A screw
carrying an electrical feeler spanned the radius of the disk, as the disk rotated,
“turning with great quickness”, so the screw moved the feeler which lay on the
damp paper from its rim to its axis writing a spiral of long and short dashes.
When the apparatus was tested by the assembled scientists it chemically printed
1,200 ‘letters’ in forty-five seconds. Subsequently this Bain automatic
telegraph was given a more robust trial on the circuit between Paris and Lyons.
The two wires of this line were joined at Lyons creating a 336 mile circuit
back to Paris, to which were added wire coils to extend the length to 1,082
miles. A message of 282 words was then transmitted and received on the adjacent
disk in fifty-two seconds. Despite this success the French selected the American telegraph in place of their Breguet needle apparatus. ![]() Bain "Band" Telegraph 1852
What was almost Bain’s last telegraph patent in England was granted on May 29, 1852 for further “Improvements in Electric Telegraphs”. In this the sender was the common on-off “finger pedal”; the receiver was a unique contrivance that used an endless narrow cloth band several feet in length with a loose hanging fringe, moved horizontally by clockwork. The current was used to deflect the fringe either side of a long plate that paralleled the endless band; by this means the clerk could read the message as it travelled along the plate from whether the fringe was in front or behind it. Bain "Finger pedal" or Key
Copied from an American model, it appears in most of his later British patents Living Large • Patent electric clocks, suitable for
halls of mansions, offices, steeples, &c., kept in action by a small galvanic
battery, or the electricity of the earth
Bain
Electro-Chemical Telegraph 1850 The Great Exhibition occupied much of
Bain’s time and energy during 1851, in preparation for the event and in
attending the display stand between May 1 and October 15. The Crystal Palace in
Hyde Park proved not to be the best venue to show his electric clocks, movement
of insubstantial floor boards of the galleries caused their pendulums to
quiver. The ‘Morning Chronicle’ reported that of the four he displayed on the
first Wednesday, two had stopped by Saturday, and the other two “varied by some
minutes” for this reason. When Alexander Bain returned to London in
1850, he was, apparently, comfortably off, living with his wife, Matilda, in a
large house in Hammersmith, a small, smart suburb of London, on the river
Thames, with five servants and a teacher for their six children. One of his
neighbours there was Charles Wheatstone. His chemical telegraph patent in America
was validated, despite the attacks of the Morse Syndicate; over two thousand
miles of circuits had been built using his rights. At this time Bain still
possessed valid, and possibly valuable, patents in British North America,
France, Belgium and Austria for the chemical telegraph; in England for a
musical instrument and for the electric ship’s log; and in France for the
electric clock. Bain also claimed to possess 100 shares in the Mississippi
& Illinois Telegraph Company, 1,354 shares in the People’s Telegraph Line
(Louisville to New Orleans), 100 shares in the Ohio, Indiana & Illinois
Telegraph Company, 225 shares in the Vermont & Boston Telegraph Company and
71 shares in the New York State Telegraph Company; all of some value in
America. Previously, in 1848, the Electric
Telegraph Company had returned his patent rights to the electric clock, all
their stock and the implements for their manufacture. Bain had neglected his
“first child” for the telegraph, now with the pressure of the Great Exhibition
past he took up electric timekeeping once gain and, on April 30, 1852 he opened
a fine shop, with showrooms and manufactory, at 43 Old Bond Street, Mayfair,
London, large premises lately occupied by Henry and William Powell,
coach-builders, four doors from Piccadilly, to retail his clocks. It was,
interestingly, just a few minutes’ walk from Wheatstone Brothers, musical instrument
makers, at 20 Conduit Street, Mayfair. However, all was not what it seemed.
Henry Fletcher, a bookseller, had advertised in the London newspapers in
October 1851 that he had money to invest in a new business. Bain borrowed
£1,000 from Fletcher, his life savings, offering 5% interest and a salary of
£250 a year to be his Manager. Andrew Bonar, an Edinburgh merchant of some
means living in London, was also induced to advance Bain £1,770 at 5% and £300
a year “for his influence in favour of ‘the clocks’” in 1852. A handsome illustrated pamphlet, ‘A Short
History of the Electric Clocks’ was published by Chapman & Hall in concert
with the new venture. The author was Alexander Bain, “the Patentee.”
Advertisements announcing the opening of the showroom were taken in the London
papers, ‘The Times’, the ‘Daily News’ and the ‘Morning Chronicle’.
Bain
electric clocks 1852 Advertisement in the Daily News, May 21, 1852
Bain
electric companion clocks 1852 Utterly Reckless When his accounts were examined, they ran
only from January 1, 1852 until December 3, 1852, and eventually balanced it
was revealed that in January 1852 Bain was already £4,393 in debt, and was
relying entirely on credit for his existence. He claimed as assets the residual
rights to his several patents in Europe, £16,300, and property in America,
comprising clocks and telegraph models, half of the chemical patent right and
stock in telegraph companies, £22,350. Even before he left for America in 1848
the money he received from the Electric Telegraph Company in 1846 for the British
rights to the chemical telegraph, £10,000, had all gone – mainly to pay his legal
and parliamentary costs in fighting the same company. The values put on the European rights and
American assets were illusory. In the weeks previous Bain had despatched his
solicitor to New York in an attempt to redeem his assets there; he came away
with nothing. Marshall Lefferts had already sold his controlling interest in
the rights to the Morse Syndicate rendering Bain’s portion, claimed as half,
worthless. The trading accounts of the shop were
disastrous. Cash sales in 1852 were £1,200, profit was £70. Bain’s expenses
included £599 for his house, £520 for law costs, £347 for staff wages, and £206
for interest on loans. The sums borrowed exceeded £4,200. Bain had been lavish
with other people’s money. The few timepieces sold at the shop were
marked on the silvered dial “Alexr Bain’s Patent Electric Clock”. In addition to these woes the very
short-lived Electric Time Company intended to promote a Bill for an Act of Parliament
to acquire the residue of Bain’s clock patent and to manufacture his timepieces.
The Bill authorised its provision of timepieces and its charging for supplying
time by electricity, as well as powers to open up roads, streets and highways
in England and Wales for its time circuits. The Bill was deposited on November
1, 1852, but then almost immediately abandoned. Apart from Bain it is not known
who the promoters were. The Time company failed miserably, not making a single
electric clock and leaving Bain with liabilities of £4,364. The bankruptcy court pointedly observed
that his borrowings of Fletcher, who was reduced to penury, and Bonar had
funded a substantial lifestyle rather than improving the clock business. It
also catalogued his previous, and equally unfortunate, financial backers, Barwise,
Wright, Boggett and Finlaison. He appeared before the court on December
16, 1852 and several times during the spring of 1853. There were three classes
of bankruptcy certificate, the first was granted almost immediately if it came
about through unavoidable losses or misfortunes; the third if there were wilful
or criminal intent, and was a “stigma for life”; Bain fell into the second
class, between the two, although described as “utterly reckless as to the consequences”
of his borrowing in mitigation he had given up all he had, his shares and his
patents, to his creditors, and there was no fraud or preference in his accounting.
He was given a year in April 1853 to co-operate and settle with his deeply suspicious
creditors with an allowance of £3 a week from the estate. Bain was finally
discharged from bankruptcy on May 11, 1854. Two dividends were eventually paid,
8d in the pound on June 28, 1853, and 11/12d (0.91d) in the pound on December
6, 1859, 3¾ % in all. His large family were compelled to move
from the house by the river Thames at Hammersmith to Westbourne Park Road in
slightly less congenial Paddington in 1853. Their story after 1856 is vague, however
on August 14 of that year Matilda Bain died at the house of John Finlaison, her
elderly brother-in-law and Bain’s former patron, in Richmond, Surrey. What happened
subsequently does not reflect well on Alexander Bain. It is not known who cared
for their six children between 1856 and 1860, but when Bain left again for America
the children, ranging in age between fifteen years and ten, were divided. At
least one was lodged in the British Orphan Asylum in Clapham during 1861 and
died in 1865. With the exception of one daughter, a teacher in India, the
others vanish from history; none were part of Alexander Bain’s later life. America Again Ending up alone in the instrument-making
district of Clerkenwell Bain tinkered with odd, non-telegraphic contrivances,
including gas-meters and hydraulics, as well as pencil cases and his old
sideline, ink-stands, which he, surprisingly, found the money, or finance, to
patent. None of these patents saw out their full life of fourteen years, virtually
all became void through the failure to pay the annual fees after a couple of
years. Tiring of this existence Bain then set
off once again for America where his name still held celebrity, arriving in New
York from Liverpool on September 27, 1860 on the Cunard liner Persia.
Bain
Dial Telegraph 1863
Whilst in New York Bain developed, among other things, a new compact, galvanic dial telegraph in 1863 that worked with a pierced rotating dial much like that on the later mechanical telephone. Samples were made and it would, almost certainly, have been successful in Britain where private wire telegraphy was becoming popular, but its technology was too sophisticated for America. Still inventive, he also patented an “earphone” to listen to acoustic telegraph messages in confidence, an improved telegraphic key, an alarm or call to be used with the telegraph sounder, and an extraordinarily elaborate machine for perforating message tapes. Most of these inventions were patented in concert with the New York lawyer W H Allen, the last of his many foolhardy patrons. After all these proved unworkable Bain eventually turned to plumbing for a living before deciding to return home.
Finis Bain returned to Britain in 1866 and
tried to market his automatic chemical telegraph of 1850 for high speed
messaging in London once more, now adapted to have clockwork motion for both
sending and receiving. Unsuccessful yet again, he withdrew to Scotland as a journeyman
instrument-maker. Alexander Bain died in 1877 whilst living
in a “home for incurables”, depending on a pension organised through the
charity of former employees of the telegraph companies, having sadly lost all
of the opportunities that his electric clock, his chemical telegraph and his I
& V telegraph had offered. It is ironic, given
his fatal weakness, that the largest memorial to Alexander Bain is a drinking
house in Wick, Caithness.
Alexander Bain’s British Patents This is a complete list of all of Bain’s
twenty-one 1.] Patent 8,783, January 11, 1841 (with
John Barwise), Application of moving power to clocks and timepieces
Alexander Bain’s US Patents This is believed to be a complete list: 1.] Patent 5,967, December 5, 1848, Improvement
in copying surfaces by electricity (copying telegraph) |
||||
Telegraph, from the Greek “tele”, distant, and “graphos”, writing
|
||||
© Copyright - Steven Roberts 2012 |